Investing

The Financial Independence, Retire Early (FIRE) movement has underscored the power of financial freedom. It’s the central theme in my book, Retire Before Mom and Dad. Indeed, financial freedom is the guiding principle of how I manage money.

While financial freedom sounds good, however, many see it as a destination that’s at best 30 or 40 years away. To them, it’s just a fancy way of describing retirement.

I couldn’t disagree more.

While it’s true that we can and should define what ultimate financial freedom looks like (see below), we can begin to reap the benefits in a very short period of time. Financial Freedom is more of a journey than a destination.

It’s for this reason that my book walks through what I call the 7 Levels of Financial Freedom. And that’s what we’ll cover in this article. Be sure to check out the free financial freedom calculator near the end of the article.

4 Key Foundational Principles of Financial Freedom

First, there’s value to money that you never spend. This is counter to what must people think. Even retirement savings will eventually be spent, even if it’s decades later. Until the money is spent, and even for money we never spend, however, there is tremendous value.

What’s the value? Our freedom.

Second, the benefits of financial freedom are experienced much sooner than retirement. The ability to retire is an empowering feeling, but it’s not the only kind of empowerment that savings can afford. Lesser tiers of financial freedom can change someone’s mindset and options for the better. The seven levels below will explain this more clearly.  

Third, the levels of financial freedom are calculated based on monthly expenses, not income. The focus should be on how many months of living expenses our savings can cover. That’s real freedom. As a result, we focus on what percentage of our income we can save.

Finally, we use Bill Bengen’s 4%  withdrawal rule when calculating Level 7 Financial Freedom. In other words, we achieve the ultimate financial freedom when are savings equals 25x our annual expenses. For example, a retiree who spends $54,000 a year in retirement would need $1,350,000 to reach Level 7.

The 4% rule has come under fire lately. Some say that given high stock valuations and low bond yields, it’s no longer viable. Morningstar recently released a report claiming 3.3% is the new “safe” withdrawal rate. Time will tell who is right. For our purposes, we’ll continue to use 4% for planning purposes only.

The 7 Levels of Financial Freedom

For each level you’ll find how many months it will take to reach the level if you save 10%, 15%, 20% or 30% of your income. Keep in mind that the number of months won’t change for different income levels. In each case, it’s your savings rate that determines your time to each level.

You can run your own numbers with the financial freedom calculator here (described in more detail below).

Level 1: One Month of Expenses Saved

Level 1 might not seem like Financial Freedom, but it’s an important start to your journey. It’s here that you stop living paycheck-to-paycheck. You may only have a one-month cushion, but that’s a big deal. It gives you breathing room for when—not if—the unexpected happens.

Studies show that most people cannot come up with $400 for an emergency. According to a study by the Federal Reserve, 4 in 10 Americans couldn’t cover a $400 emergency with their savings. In other words, most Americans have not achieved Level 1 Financial Freedom.

Time to Level 1:

Note that saving 20% cuts by more than half the time to Level 1 as compared to saving 10%. That’s because as we save more we spend less. We thus get the double benefit of saving more money and need less money to meet our goal of one month of expenses. I call this the Boomerang Affect in my book.

Also note that compounding has very little to do with reaching Level 1. We haven’t yet saved enough money over enough time to see the benefits of compounding. That comes around Level 4 and after, when the majority of our wealth is from compounding.

Level 2: Three Months of Expenses Saved

At Level 2, we reach what most financial gurus say is the minimum emergency fund you should have. You now have enough money in the bank to handle most emergencies. The money could even help you survive during a short-term job transition.

Reaching this point should taste sweet. If an unexpected expense pops up, there isn’t a need to borrow money to cover it. This is important given avoiding high-interest debt is essential to reaching financial freedom. 

Time to Level 2:

The effect of compounding interest is still in its nascent stage by Level 2. The example shows that around 5% of the ending balance comes from investment returns. Building wealth takes time.

The numbers do change when the savings rate changes. Changing the savings rate in the example to 20% instead of 10% halves the time it takes to reach Level 2. As an investor lives further and further below their means, their journey toward greater financial freedom becomes exponentially faster.

Level 3: Six Months of Expenses

Level 3 is simply the upper bound of an emergency fund, with 6 months of expenses. The balance should be able to cover the unfortunate possibility of all insurance deductibles coming due simultaneously. An extended unemployment period also would be manageable. Compound interest begins to become noticeable.   

Time to Level 3:

Level 4: One Year of Expenses

Level 4 is when things start to get interesting. Two things happen.

First, with one year of expenses saved, you can handle a significant bout of unemployment. Today the average person will change jobs 12 times during their lifetime. While we hope these transitions go smoothly, Level 4 Financial Freedom will help you ride out any bumps in the road.

Second, we start to see the benefits of compounding, something I call the Money Multiplier in my book. As we now know, most of our Freedom Fund doesn’t come from putting aside money each month. That’s how it starts, of course, when we are trying to reach Level 1, 2, or even 3.

Eventually, however, the money we save starts to earn a nice return. In fact, if done right, our investments will produce far more income than our jobs. That takes time, and it’s here at Level 4 that we start to get a glimpse of the power of the Money Multiplier.

Time to Level 4:

Level 5: Five Years of Expenses

At Level 5, you’ve already exceeded the savings that most will achieve in a lifetime. Assuming $50,000 in annual expenses (the round number makes the math easier), for example, you’ve amassed $250,000 in savings and investments. At a 9.3% return (the average return of an 80/20 portfolio over the last 90 years), your Freedom Fund will generate almost $25,000 in returns over the next 12 months. In other words, your investments are generating income approaching 50% of your annual spending.

Level 5 also represents a danger point. It’s here that some may become complacent. With so much money saved, it’s easy to return to old habits or to lose focus. Knowing that now will help you avoid this danger when you reach Level 5.

At this point you may be wondering what Level 5 Financial Freedom feels like. After all, one could say this is nothing more than traditional retirement savings. Oh, but it’s so much more!

Let me tell you a story.

In the middle of my career, I had a job that at times was very unpleasant. I have a vivid memory of a meeting with the boss. He was yelling at an employee on the phone. He was out of line. It was then I understood the true power of Financial Freedom.

While my wife and I hadn’t reached Level 7 at that time, we were right around Level 5. I knew I could walk out of that job if I needed to and we’d be fine financially. I wasn’t stuck. And it was a great feeling.

Less than a year later, I took a pay cut to pursue a new opportunity. I took that risk because I could; I wasn’t chained to my job or to the salary. It turned out to be the best career move of my life. And it was made possible because of Level 5 Financial Freedom.

This is an example of how money saved and never spent can have a profound effect on our lives.

Time to Level 5:

Level 6: Ten Years of Expenses

Level 6 is an important milestone. It’s here that your investment income will begin to equal and then exceed how much you are spending each year.

Let’s again assume you spend $50,000 a year. At Level 6, you will have a Freedom Fund totaling $500,000. A 9.3% return will generate returns of $46,500 over the next 12 months, bringing your Freedom Fund to $546,500. The following year, with a Freedom Fund totaling almost $550,000, you will on average generate just over $50,000 a year.

Talk about a great feeling! You are working hard, earning an income, and spending $50,000 a year. At the same time, your Freedom Fund is generating returns equaling the same amount. Like a snowball rolling downhill, your wealth is multiplying before your very eyes.

Time to Level 7:

Level 7: Twenty-Five Years of Expenses

Level 7 is the Ultimate Financial Freedom. It’s here that you can completely retire from work if you so choose. Or, if you’re like me, you can work on projects you love while still earning an income. The choice is yours.

Level 7 enabled me to retire from the practice of law at 49. Following my retirement, I continued to run my personal finance blog, newsletter, and podcast. Two years later I sold my blog, but I still record a podcast each month, and I became a Deputy Editor at Forbes for a couple of years. These activities generated income. But I did them because I’m passionate about personal finance and investing.

When you reach Level 7, you can pursue your passions. That may mean keeping your job. There’s nothing wrong with that if that’s what you love. It may mean starting a business. Here’s the point—you decide for yourself what you’ll do when you reach Level 7. It’s a beautiful feeling.

Time to Level 7:

A Simple Financial Freedom Calculator

I’ve created a free financial freedom calculator in Google Sheets. The tool is simple to use. You simply input the following four things:

1. Rate of return
2. After-tax income
3. Savings rate
4. Current savings

From there the tool estimates how long it will take you to reach each level of financial freedom.

The tool has an investment rate of return of 5% input by default. This roughly represents the historical post-inflation return of a 60-40 stock/bond portfolio. You can change the assumption to whatever you like.

Debt is conspicuously missing from the spreadsheet. This is because debt payments are accounted for in the after-tax income section. Debt repayment is considered a recurring monthly expense. It’s possible to be financially free while having some debt and the calculations reflect that.

The baseline savings rate is listed at 10%. That number is in line with conventional retirement advice. Over an average 40-45 working life an investor would be on track to retire at 65 given a 10% savings rate. Again, that figure can be changed in the spreadsheet.

Finally, be sure to alter the current savings section. Many will be starting at more than zero. The number should include emergency short-term savings as well as retirement or brokerage account balances.

Final Thoughts

Financial freedom is the best thing money can buy. As I was working toward the goal, I viewed every dollar I saved as buying my financial freedom. At first it starts off slow, but it quickly builds to the point that compounding generates far more money than we could ever make at work. The key is to get started now.

And for those that want to track their progress with a more sophisticated tool, check out Personal Capital. It’s free and the best overall net worth, investment and retirement planning tool available today.

Target date retirement funds make investing in a 401(k) or IRA easy. Simply pick a fund that corresponds with when you plan to retire, and the fund does the rest. In this article we’ll look at several of the best target date retirement funds available today.

Target date retirement funds can be great tools for long-term investors. There are, however, factors that differentiate great target date funds from others I would not recommend. I’ve researched dozens of funds to identify the best options, as well as an example of a target date fund you should avoid.

4 Best Target Date Retirement Funds

For each of the target date funds below, we’ll explore the 2050 version. A 2050 fund is designed for those retiring around the year 2050. Each of these fund families offer funds in five-year increments (e.g., 2020, 2025, 2030).

M1 Finance Target Date Retirement Funds

M1 Finance retirement funds make the top of my list for several reasons. First, for each retirement year (e.g., 2020, 2025, 2030), M1 Finance offers three different funds. All of the other options below only offer one. Specifically, M1 Finance offers investors Aggressive, Moderate and Conservative options for each retirement year.

For example, the M1 Finance 2050 Aggressive Target Date Retirement Fund allocates just 3% to bonds, while its 2050 Conservative fund allocates 19% to bonds.

Second, each of M1 Finance’s funds (they call them Pies) include broad stock and bond exposure across more than a dozen low cost ETFs. Here, for example, are the ETFs used in the 2050 Aggressive fund:

Third, unlike the other funds in my list, there is no elevated expense ratio to pay. M1 Finance doesn’t charge a fee. The only fees are those associated with the low cost ETFs M1 uses in each portfolio, and these are lower than the fees a target date fund charges.

Finally, the fund for those now in retirement (the 2020 fund) is in my view the best option available. The Aggressive 2020 fund is approximately 60/40 stock to bond allocation a reasonable approach for retirees following the 4% rule. Without exception other retirement funds become far too conservative at this stage.

M1 Finance target date funds are automatically updated and rebalanced quarterly. There is no minimum initial investment required.

Summary

• Expense Ratio: 0.08%
• Dividend Yield: 1.831%
• Minimum Investment: None
• Website: M1 Finance

Vanguard Target-Date Retirement Funds

Vanguard’s 2050 offering, ticker VFIFX, is another solid option.

The expense ratio for the fund is extremely reasonable at only 15 basis points (0.15%). Important to note given low fees often predict the later success of a fund. VFIFX checks that box. 

Turning to the Portfolio tab on Morningstar gives us a better look into the asset allocation of the fund.

Vanguard’s 2050 fund is 54% invested in US stocks and about 37% invested in international stocks. The remaining 9% of the fund is allocated to bonds. This aggressive investment mix makes sense given that it’s tailored for an investor with 30 years left to build their Portfolio. Keep in mind that this allocation will become more weighted toward fixed income as we get closer to 2050.

Vanguard implements this asset allocation plan using five Vanguard funds:

Five holdings doesn’t seem diversified. Here it’s important to understand that the number of funds in a portfolio tells us nothing about its overall diversification. We need to know what each of the funds owns. In this case, the holdings include thousands of stocks and more than 10,000 bonds. It’s well diversified.

Vanguard requires a $1,000 minimum initial investment.

Summary

• Expense Ratio: 0.15%
• Dividend Yield: 1.41%
• Minimum Investment: $1,000
• Website: Vanguard

State Street Target Date Retirement Funds

State Street’s 2050 target date retirement fund, ticker SSDLX, makes a strong impression with only a 9 basis point (.09%) expense ratio. It’s one of the least expensive options available today.

Its asset allocation is similar to Vanguard’s.

The Portfolio tab shows us the fund is invested 51% in U.S. stocks, 35% in international stocks, and about 10% in bonds. The holdings of the fund reveal more similarities to its Vanguard counterpart. It invests the fund in six index funds.

Three stock funds and two bond funds substitute for the inverse with Vanguard’s offering. The U.S. stock portion of the fund is split into an S&P 500 large blend fund and a mid-cap growth fund. Still, State Street’s fund should perform in line with Vanguard’s, with the added benefit of the lower expense ratio we saw earlier. 

Summary

• Expense Ratio: 0.09%
• Dividend Yield: 1.32%
• Minimum Investment: None
• Website: State Street

Fidelity Freedom Index Funds

The final fund is Fidelity’s Freedom Index 2050 Investor, ticker FIPFX. The exact naming of this fund is important to note. FIPFX has the word index in the fund name. Fidelity offers another Freedom 2050 target-date fund, but the underlying holdings consist of actively managed mutual funds.

As a result, that fund charges 75 basis points (.75%) in fees. In contrast, the Freedom Index fund only charges 12 basis points (.12%). That expense ratio puts the Fidelity fund in between State Street’s and Vanguard’s options.

The asset allocation of this fund is nearly identical to the Vanguard, State Street and M1 Finance Moderate funds.

Nothing surprising jumps out–53% of the fund is allocated to U.S. stocks and 37% to international stocks. Bonds fill out the remaining 10%. 

The holdings of the fund shouldn’t shock anyone either. Fidelity uses Fidelity index funds to implement its asset allocation.

Overall, another sensibly arranged portfolio–Diversified, low-cost, and convenient. 

Summary

• Expense Ratio: 0.12%
• Dividend Yield: 1.18%
• Minimum Investment: None
• Website: Fidelity

Target Date Retirement Funds in 401(k) Accounts

If target-date retirement funds are starting to seem like attractive options, it might be worth considering holding a target date fund in a 401k if one is available to you. Since company 401(k) plans often invest hundreds of millions at a time, mutual fund providers may offer companies an expense ratio discount to attract their business.

For example, ticker FRLPX is the Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 option offered in my 401(k) at Forbes. This version of the fund has the same asset allocation, holdings, and glide path but charges half the fees of the non-401(k) investor class fund. 

I mention this industry convention not only to highlight the fee difference but also to prevent any confusion when picking funds in a 401(k). If there’s any doubt as to whether one fund mirrors another, it’s best to check the Portfolio tab on the Morningstar listing for both funds and make sure the only difference is the expense ratio.

Backtesting Target Date Funds

For a performance comparison of the funds, we’ll be using Portfolio Visualizer. This site is great for backtesting portfolio options and provides a number of useful metrics for weighing funds. The data set will be limited by the age of the newest target-date retirement fund, but we have a reasonable length of time to compare the funds. 

The 3 funds compete very closely with one another. The Fidelity fund ultimately wins out by only a couple hundred dollars. The standard deviation of the funds, a measure of portfolio volatility, is fairly uniform from fund to fund. The same goes for the maximum drawdown period of the funds. Safe to say, any of the three funds are reasonable and comparable options.

The M1 Finance fund has had similar return and risk characteristics.

Not All Target Date Funds are Good Investments

I’ve chosen one fund that exemplifies some suboptimal aspects that should signal investors to steer clear. I do this not to belittle the mutual fund company or fund in particular, but to illustrate what potential negative qualities of target date funds can cost investor’s future returns.

The fund is called the American Century One Choice 2050, ticker ARFMX. I would avoid the fund for two main reasons. 

First off, the fund’s expense ratio is simply too high. American Century charges over 1%, making it more than 10 times as expensive as the fund options we’ve looked at. Unfortunately, that isn’t the end of the fees associated with investing in the fund. ARFMX has a front load fee, meaning there’s a sales charge paid every time you buy into the fund. Purchasing through a 401(k) would bypass that fee. Otherwise, and I can’t caution against this enough, that fee would recur every time a contribution is made.

The second reason why I’m not a fan of this fund is its asset allocation.

Remember that American Century’s target date is a 2050 fund just like the 4 funds we explored. That means the typical investor in the fund is 30 years away from retirement. Nevertheless, the fund allocations 22% in bonds. For some investors, that conservative approach might be attractive. But in my estimation, that is too cautious a strategy for investors with such long time horizons.

An 80/20 split between stocks and bonds is perfectly reasonable in a vacuum, but remember the fund will increase its bond allocation over time. Overall, the fund is a suboptimal choice given its fee burden and asset allocation. 

The American Century fund performance in comparison to Vanguard’s offering should bear out my concerns. 

That data for this backtest in Portfolio Visualizer goes back to 2009. The fund’s fees and asset allocation drag on the ugly duckling fund to the tune of almost a full percent less in returns.

The key point is to recognize that not all target date funds are created equal.

How Target Date Retirement Funds Work

Target date retirement funds feature a date in their name. For example, the funds we’ve discussed are 2050 funds. The date corresponds to the investor’s planned retirement date. Somebody seeking to retire in about 30 years would be especially interested in 2050 funds.

Target date retirement fund offerings are typically spaced out in 5-year increments, meaning there are 2045 and 2055 versions of the funds we’ve explored. Picking a retirement date is not an exact science and things do change. Still, having a target date in the fund name provides some useful information about the fund’s asset allocation today and in the future. 

Target date retirement funds hold a combination of U.S. stocks, international stocks, and bonds. The specific weighting of those asset classes adjusts over time and can vary between mutual fund companies. The expense ratio associated with target date funds goes, in part, toward paying for these adjustments. Allocation adjustments are made based on “glide paths”, which are predetermined rebalancing plans that each target date retirement fund follows.

As investors get closer to their chosen retirement date, target date funds shift more heavily toward bonds and away from stocks. This shift is meant to reduce portfolio volatility during investors’ retirements. An attractive approach in theory but one that can create some pitfalls, which we’ll address next. 

The Downside of Target Date Funds for Retirees

Target date funds are a reasonable approach to investing for retirement. Once you reach retirement, however, these funds have a downside. They become far too conservative.

These funds follow a declining glide path. That simply means that as we get closer to retirement, the funds move stock investments over to bond investments. That in itself is reasonable. The problem is that they become far too conservative.

For example, the Vanguard Target Retirement 2015 fund is only 30% invested in stocks. A retiree six years in might want the security of a healthy bond allocation, but I would argue there’s such thing as being too safe. Granted, I’ve shifted my own investments into safer investments in retirement. Still, I wouldn’t recommend divesting a portfolio of stocks past the 50% mark.

In fact, Bill Bengen, the father of the 4% rule, found that a retiree’s portfolio should have 50% to 75% in stocks. Anything less and their odds of running out of money early go up.

With the exception of M1 Finance, each of the target date funds mentioned above fall well below the 50% equity floor.

Are Target Date Retirement Funds Diversified?

Diversification is important to any investor. Investing in a single mutual fund seems counter to that idea, but not in the case of target date retirement funds. Target date retirement funds provide ready-made diversified portfolios that hold thousands of domestic and international stocks and tens of thousands of bonds of various credit qualities. So yes, these funds are well diversified.

Final Thoughts

While I don’t personally invest in target date retirement funds, they are still reasonable and effective options. I advocate that investors start their wealth-building plans with a 3-fund portfolio. That said, the solid target date fund options we’ve discussed are all reasonable approaches to retirement investing.